Diaries Magazine

A Life Sentence

Posted on the 14 April 2015 by Middleagedmatron @ageingmatron
This was my mother two years ago:
A Life Sentence
This was the newspaper where she had been features editor for 40 years:
A Life Sentence
This was the zebra she crossed on her way home from work on the night of November 26th 2013:
A Life Sentence
This was the consultant from the adjacent hospital who failed to stop in time:

A Life Sentence


This is the hospital where my mother spent five months recovering from her injuries:
A Life Sentence
This is how many times the court hearing was delayed to accommodate the driver's defence team:
A Life Sentence
This is the magistrates court where the trial took place 18 months later:
A Life Sentence
This was the sentence, along with costs and a £15 victim surcharge, when the driver was found guilty of driving without due care and attention:
A Life Sentence
This is the sentence my mother, brain-damaged, disabled and dependent, is serving:
A Life Sentence
A stiffer sentence would not change anything. The driver was not speeding or phoning or drunken. He made a fleeting mistake. A mistake anyone of us could make when we drive a familiar route home. A mistake that cost my mother her job, her dignity and her independence and which he relives every time he gets in a car.
But the fact that someone flashed by a speed camera will automatically receive a harsher punishment - penalty points and a £100 fine - shows that there's something wrong with the law. Speeding counts as dangerous driving whether or not there's a victim. Running someone over on a zebra because you were not looking properly is driving without due care and attention and only if they die does the law, as it stands, recognize the consequences.
My mother nearly died from her injuries. The magistrates were unable to take this into account because the offense of causing serious injury by careless driving does not exist. It should do. Not so that weary doctors who don't look where they're going are obliged to face jail, but so that the charges acknowledge the difference between damaging a bollard through inattention and damaging a woman on her way home from the office. So that families don't have to wait 18 months for what counts as a minor matter to reach the front of the queue in court. So that the lawmakers and anyone who gets behind a wheel appreciates that it doesn't require death for a life to be destroyed.

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog

About the author


Middleagedmatron 156 shares View Blog

The Author's profile is not complete.