Humans aren’t perfect.
Let’s start with that.
We cheat, steal, hate and yes, we lie.
So why is this new fangled policy, “Believe all women”, getting so much traction by the Left? Because it’s the RIGHT thing to do…right?
No.
The right thing to do is accept that human nature in itself is, at its core, flawed; and we utilize the justice system to navigate ourselves in order to punish those deemed guilty by due process.
The #MeToo movement has gone too far.
And I mean way too far.
The movement has become a conveyor belt to carry anyone’s rape accusations to the highest tear of respect, maybe even further than god.
The already trending hash-tag is now a caravan of angry ‘feminazis’ sputtering away at their Twitter feed, attempting to pull down the so-called “patriarchy”.
Of course what they don’t care about pulling down are the numerous innocent men that are brought down with it, and their livelihoods.
If you don’t believe me, ask Emily Lindin- a columnist at Teen Vogue. She summed up the very toxic opinion of this movement on her Twitter feed recently. “I’m actually not at all concerned about innocent men losing their jobs over false sexual assault/harassment allegations,” she wrote. “If some innocent men’s reputations have to take a hit in the process of undoing the patriarchy, that is a price I am absolutely willing to pay.”
After I read that, I felt like putting a bullet down my throat.
You CANNOT believe all women, especially without corroborative evidence. I mean, of course you have the freedom to do so as an individual, but don’t expect the judicial system will follow your protocol. The judiciary will weigh evidence to evidence, after which they will put forth a decision that is predicated on that evidence. There is a reason why such protocol is followed: because if it wasn’t, it could lead to prosecutorial abuses and an abundance of charges the accused individuals would have to disprove.
Innocent Till Proven Guilty.
That’s the universal right granted to us all in order to protect us.
Third wave feminism wants to ignore this principle, this vital principle that western civilization is built on.
Corroborative evidence is required for an accusation to be legitimate; if not what type of precedence will it create? If we allow a rape allegation or a sexual harassment claim to be credible with no corroborative evidence, then parallels can be drawn for other criminal cases as well. If someone is simply called out for petty theft with no evidence will that person go to jail? If an individual is simply called out for murder will that individual go to jail? In our reality, in western civilization: absolutely fucking not. But the atmosphere that third-wave feminism has painted is one of lazy disingenuous conclusions which have uprooted a behemoth amount of malevolence and anger; and such an atmosphere can create a dangerous obligation for all people to adapt to. One where we do prosecute based on the allegation, not with evidence.
It’s the Salem Witch Trials all over again…Fuck me, right?
Now this is where we come to Brett Kavanaugh (that’s right ladies and gentlemen, we’re going to talk about Brett Kavanugh, so buckle up because shit’s about to get real).
Trump’s Supreme Court nominee had to undergo a lot of criticism, and when I say “undergo criticism” it’s an understatement. As soon as he was nominated to be the next Supreme Court nominee the Left flew off the rails and trashed their bandwagon of thugs into their moral compass.
The Democrats could not afford a judge who favours anti-abortion laws, and considering the senate is a majority of Republicans; Judge Kavanaugh was going to be slamming that gavel against Democratic policies with smooth transition.
But not so fast.
Then came Dr.Christine Blasey Ford, at a very convenient time for the Democrats.
Dr.Christine Blasey Ford accused Brett Kavanugh of violent attempted rape.
Her accusations against Kavanaugh polarized debate to a new a dimension.
Anyone who supported Kavanaugh equaled a misogynistic man who rapes women on a daily basis; anyone who believed Ford’s testimony -with zero evidence- was a knight in shining armor whose eyes only wished to see justice and harmony…
In the Senate hearing she stated that she had zero recollection of quite a few important factors: the house, street, even her own age and grade. The biggest joke of all is how she forgot the year it happened… the fucking year. Even worse is that, the four other people she identified as attending the party, including Kavanaugh, all deny knowledge of the gathering in question, including Leland Ingham Keyser, who she calls a “lifelong friend.” She had also gone on to state that her therapist in 2012 had taken down notes regarding Kavanuagh, but surprise surprise, the notes don’t have Kavanuagh mentioned in them.
Additionally, a letter that was drafted and released in order to showcase support to Ford conspicuously did not contain Ford’s immediate family members. Majority of signatories were from her husband’s family, but her own mother and father refused to sign it.
Now, that’s hilarious, and a little tragic.
There are plenty more inconsistencies with her story, yet the left still attempts to legitimize such claims.
I mean, you can add sauce to Ford’s statements if Kavanaugh had a history of violence and non-consensual sexual endeavours, but he doesn’t. His slate is clean as fuck. Except for one simple bar fight which involved Kavanugh throwing ice at someone.
Yes, ice.
Kavanaugh puts Al Capone to shame with all this gangster behavior. Next thing you know Kavanaugh’s spitting bars with Snoop Dogg and 50 Cent about bank loans and exchange rates.
The Democrats and feminazis actually considered the ‘throwing ice’ scandal to be rock hard confirmation that Kavanaugh is nothing but sexual deviant scum.
Because what do rapists do in their free time? Throw ice at someone in a bar.
Now let’s put this all aside for a second.
Yes, I understand that all their life rape victims want to forget, and with a flick of a switch they’re obligated to remember everything.
Yes, I understand that the justice system has its flaws and is not coherent enough to prosecute all rapists and sexual abusers.
Yes, I understand that rape is a fucking disgusting issue that is present very largely in society.
But that doesn’t mean we abandon principle. Shouldn’t we for one second stop and consider that this man could mostly be innocent; And that every voice against him is a voice utilized to tarnish his good name and his innocent family.
Here’s a final thought I had that I will leave with you.
A claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
