I'm hetero, but I think I have some inclination of what's sexy in woman. Maybe not this?
Back in the dark ages when I was in my teens and twenties, I admit we young gals dressed as sexily and provocatively as we could, - jeans so tight you couldn't sit down etc. Actually, there was no "etc." as it was never warm enough to wear short shorts and strappy tops. It really was a fairly Victorian type of sexy, with just a "hint" of things, here and there.
Side note -Anyone remember sitting astride friends in shop changing/fitting rooms trying to do the zip up on jeans that no human should ever be wearing? I also remember going out with my sister one night, and catching a virtually empty bus into town, but not being able to sit down because of the jean situation. The bus driver kept shouting back "Plenty of seats there girls", as we drowned him out by fake-laughing uproariously at our own conversation. (Yes, you young 'uns - this was before the days of Spandex and stretch jeans.)
Anyway, back to the subject in hand (if you'll pardon the expression) - even when the booty-lishous Beyonce wore them, these are not "hot pants" - they're granny knickers. Or those baby one-pieces, complete with nappy/diaper, it would appear.
We made fun of them in Bridget Jones fer cryin' out loud. Just because you bedazzle them, doesn't make them "sexy". Sometimes less really is more!
