That's the ground I'm most comfortable in - lucky to have had one!
It is understandably difficult for most of the people to love Test cricket if they haven't experienced all that in their life. To appreciate Test cricket, one has to have, at least once in their lifetime, stepped on to a cricket field on a Sunday morning to play the format of unrestricted overs' cricket. It is romantic in ways the shorter formats can never be realized. While 50 overs' one-day cricket is something that strikes a perfect balance between the shorter and longer versions of the game, retaining in parts, the mental aspect of Test cricket and the pace of Twenty20 cricket. While many legends have voiced their support for the shortest version of the game, it has also been agreed that if one has to remain true to cricket, one has to consider both aspects of the game.Test cricket is the most aptly named ball sport. It is indeed a test, not just of the body but also of the mind. Will Brodie, the Australian sports journalist rightly comments that Test cricket is a test of not just the technique but also of ticker. Without one encounter, an individual can dominate but rarely determine the result. It would be hard to explain how it works, its appeals, the idiosyncrasies, the romanticism, to someone who didn't grow up with it.While Test cricket is a novel, Twenty20 is a tweet. Doesn't mean it lacks excitement!So what do we love most about Test cricket? Lets face it, we don't have time for a 30 hours' long game, spread across 5 days - that's the whole week, sans the weekend! I have personally thought a lot on the psychologies behind understanding this long format of the game and psyche behind finding it exciting amid the fast life of the modern world. Why is it that even though Test cricket has been declared terminal for a couple or more decades, it still provides fascinating contests? How, even though it has been declared as a financial dud, does Test cricket manage to defy all expectations and attract large attendance in certain parts of the world? There's no denying that legendary grounds like Adelaide, MCG, Lords and Eden Gardens are primarily known for the Test fixtures they host?The reason is similar to the fact that you'd rather read a novel than this blog! In some logic defying way, it's more refreshing and nourishing than the faster formats of the game.I mean I can understand that you can also go for the Chetan Bhagats and Durjoy Duttas on the shelves at the book store, but occasionally you eye the international bestseller stand and (to keep it relevant, I'm not going to pick a Burtrand Russel or some non-fiction), you find an interesting new entry by Jhumpa Lahiri or Amitav Ghosh?! And once you're down 20 pages, you realize that there's the difference - they are a class apart for a reason!By the fourth day of a Test match against Australia, every armchair spectator who stays up through all the sessions of every single day, becomes an expert alongside the Indian captain and start suggesting bowling changes and fielding strategies to dismiss the set batsmen out there in the middle. No wonder, a player's rating and his mettle, are carefully considered upon how they perform in the heat of a Test cricket cauldron.Having said that, I'm not sure if that's still the way India is doing things these days. I am obviously referring to the ongoing Border-Gavaskar Trophy, down under, particularly the selection conundrum in the first Test match at Adelaide. There were many aspects of the game that struck me as exceptionally insightful. But the very first and rather the most obvious concern was the selection of the rookie wrist spinner, Karn Shama. Why he was selected ahead of other wrist spinners like Amit Mishra and Piyush Chawla is a mystery to me, and R Ashwin's exclusion is another. With a First-Class career average of something greater than 30, the only reason to select him for the all important first fixture would be his recent outing in the Sunrisers Hyderabad jersey at the IPL earlier this year. 11 wickets in 13 T20 matches are pretty good for a debutante. But does it deem a position for him in the playing XI of the Indian Test team? I beg to differ.While clearly the way Kohli played in the Adelaide Test showed a change in the mindset of how one plays cricket in India, Test cricket itself is at the brink of extinction. Maybe IPL has something to do with it. And if it weren't for traditions and history, it would've been discontinued in the subcontinent, methinks! While now and again, certain partnerships in the ongoing series are reminiscent of the ones by Laxman, Dravid, Tendulkar and Ganguly, the bowling is largely a disappointment. Well, I guess I'm still stuck in the Ganguly era of Indian Test cricket.Anyway, while Test cricket seems to defy all cynicism and boorish behavior and refuses to die out, fans like me will continue to root for it.